I love this line from one of our posters - my answer is that the image is not that far off! Well it's definately a trend that the smaller owners and trainers just can't make it due to high expenses and low purses unless they are extremely lucky and hit it big with a good horse they acquired for a modest price. It seems to me that racing mirrors what is going on with the economy in general - either you're very wealthy or you're poor, no middle class.
Of course there are exceptions and many great partnerships around to be a part of if you want to own a racehorse, but to make it economically comfortable for most people you have to own a miniscule percentage of a horse and that is just not the same as owning a horse yourself.
This is a good time for me to share my husband's revamped web site to reflect the new reality of being an "old timer" thoroughbred racehorse trainer. He is taking a new approach to make a living off his 30 years of experience in the business. Please check out http://www.jrsmithjr.com/ and let us know what you think.
Friday, November 12, 2010
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Why is horse racing in the U.S. going downhill?
Check out the following article from a New York writer who sums up the issues very well - http://therail.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/06/reasons-for-the-decline-of-horse-racing/
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Can you explain what a broodmare sire is please?
The correct way to describe a horse's sire (father) and dam (mother) is to say "the horse's name" is "by the sire's name" and "out of the dam's name", then you say the dam's sire "by the dam sire's name". For example:
"Secretariat" is by "Bold Ruler" out of "Somethingroyal" by "Princequillo". So Secretariat's father is Bold Ruler, his mother is Somethingroyal and his mother's father is Princequillo.
The "dam sire" is also spoken of as a "broodmare sire" and can be an important consideration when buying or breeding a horse. See http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racing/thoroughbred-breeding/sire-lists/broodmare which is a ranking of broodmare sires.
"Secretariat" is by "Bold Ruler" out of "Somethingroyal" by "Princequillo". So Secretariat's father is Bold Ruler, his mother is Somethingroyal and his mother's father is Princequillo.
The "dam sire" is also spoken of as a "broodmare sire" and can be an important consideration when buying or breeding a horse. See http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racing/thoroughbred-breeding/sire-lists/broodmare which is a ranking of broodmare sires.
Could you explain some terms?
>> When I hang out with horse oriented people at the track I sometimes hear very mysterious talk. Could you explain the terms "on the bridle" and "off the bridle" ?
"On the bridle" means in general that the horse accepts the bit and the connection to the reins and hands. In the case of a racehorse you can tell that there is a strong connection from the hands/reins to the bit and the horse because the horse wants to go on and run but is listening to the rider and the rider can feel the energy under him or her. When a racehorse is "off the bridle" he is not carrying himself with any energy, it feels to the rider like the horse wants to quit rather than race on, and there's no feeling of connection from the rider's hands to the horse's mouth so the rider may say "he spit the bit".
It's possible for a horse to rush from the gate and get his head up and ignore the rider. In this case he is not "on the bridle", he is "running off". Anyone who has ever been "run off with" know how terrible it feels because the horse is totally ignoring the rider, so this condition can't be called "on the bridle". In fact after the horse tires himself out, he will often "stop"- and this is a little different than "off the bridle".
As an aside, "off the bridle" to me is a european term. "He spit the bit" is an american old timer's term, maybe something Woody Stephens would have said.
"On the bridle" means in general that the horse accepts the bit and the connection to the reins and hands. In the case of a racehorse you can tell that there is a strong connection from the hands/reins to the bit and the horse because the horse wants to go on and run but is listening to the rider and the rider can feel the energy under him or her. When a racehorse is "off the bridle" he is not carrying himself with any energy, it feels to the rider like the horse wants to quit rather than race on, and there's no feeling of connection from the rider's hands to the horse's mouth so the rider may say "he spit the bit".
It's possible for a horse to rush from the gate and get his head up and ignore the rider. In this case he is not "on the bridle", he is "running off". Anyone who has ever been "run off with" know how terrible it feels because the horse is totally ignoring the rider, so this condition can't be called "on the bridle". In fact after the horse tires himself out, he will often "stop"- and this is a little different than "off the bridle".
As an aside, "off the bridle" to me is a european term. "He spit the bit" is an american old timer's term, maybe something Woody Stephens would have said.
Sunday, July 18, 2010
well no, it's not possible, not right now.
A while back I asked an apparently rhetorical question (nobody answered) about whether it would be possible for 2 veteran horse racing professionals to disappear from the business for 5 years and then return to start a new racing stable from scratch in the US. We tried to do it starting April 2009 and we gave up about 1 year later. Even with the advantage of our own investment startup money, we were not able to sustain the business, also despite our previous 30 years of experience, contacts, former successful investors, early success with a small stable, all new technology to help attract and retain clients, in short every possible advantage. So what was the problem? I will try to summarize:
1. race purses are not high enough to sufficiently offset the costs of racing, shipping, routine veterinary work, feed and payroll. You might be OK if you always finish 1st or 2nd with every horse or if every horse has an owner willing and able to pay $75/day toward the maintainence of each horse. In order to get started we had to own a few horses or take half ownership of client horses, and we had too many 2nds with those horses. So in a race with a $10,000 purse, we had too many finish 2nd for a 20% share or $2000 instead of a winner's 60% share or $6000. A 2nd place finisher earning $2000 only covered his own expenses for 1 month. If that horse needed 2 months between races, we are in the hole if we own him. We had 7 wins, 10 seconds, 4 thirds during the year - if 2 or 3 of those 2nd placers had won we might have broken even most of the year.
2. we were unable to recruit an owner willing to send us a horse and pay $75/day toward his care. It was our experience that for owners to be willing to take a chance on our start-up (even if they were our former clients in years past), they required a significant discount on day rate, generally $55-$65 was the day rate they would pay. It was our experience racing in Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois and Florida that this rate will not allow a trainer to break even on shipping, feed, payroll and the cost of rental housing while traveling - especially if too many horses finish 2nd instead of 1st.
I think this is part of the reason for the trend toward the mega-stables, the old "economy of scale" rule. These stables have enough cash flow to keep the whole machine running even if some owners get behind on monthly invoices. A small start-up can't carry owners who get behind because they must have enough cash on hand to make payroll and to buy feed. Unfortunately in a mega-stable, the individual horse is often lost in a crowd.
3. we were unable to organize partnerships of 2-5 investors to claim horses. This may have been due to the state of the economy in 2009 and 2010, because we had 8-10 investors interested who backed out when it came time to deposit several thousand $ with the track bookkeeper. Most people said the timing was bad. If we could show them something about the investment to help them see it as a way to help their business with networking opportunities, then things might have been different.
A private club for owners at the track would work wonders - most tracks offer trainers some options to give owners access to a jockey club suite or dining room reservations when they have a horse "in", but these are very ineffective for attracting new owners. The track needs to have a big room with easy access to paddock and winners circle for elderly owners or those who can't deal with crowds, food and drink in a chic atmosphere, and only open to licensed owners with 5% or more share of a horse and licensed trainers - and no additional membership fee - essentially an upscale "horsemen's lounge". One reason tracks don't do this is because they don't know who the owners are - the corporate office, the racing office and the bookkeeper don't share owner and trainer data. An owner has to go through a time consuming and expensive process just to get licensed, giving all their personal data to the state's racing commission, including percent ownership and home address, yet when you call the bookkeeper to get a check from your account they have no idea what your address is? The "front side" (corporate) and the "back side" (horsemen) of the tracks don't usually work well together if at all and that's a shame.
4. synthetic tracks were a big, major problem for us. If you have a horse that has never run on a synthetic track before, but the only available race when he is ready to run is on synthetic then it's a huge gamble to try him on it. A small stable can't afford to gamble like this but we felt we had to do it, and in every case we lost the gamble either due to a very consistent dirt or grass horse not handling the polytrack at all, or due to injuries on polytrack. If you don't have an owner to pay the upkeep, the only way for the horse to support himself is to race. If the horse doesn't like synthetic, you have to ship to the dirt or turf race and that costs money that the owner is gambling to recoup in the race. Shipping is very expensive. So you end up gambling on the shipping expense or gambling on the surface, neither is sound business.
We had 3 injuries all year, all on polytrack, one during a race at Keeneland which was a race career ending suspensory (we gave him away so we took a huge loss, but he is now a show horse so that's a bright spot, see his recent photo taken January 2011 at right), one during training at Keeneland which was a hind pastern fracture requiring 3 months rest, and one front tendon in a race at Arlington in which our horse finished 2nd (we sold her at a $10k loss).
So we plan to return to Saudi Arabia to train for a single owner with 20-30 horses. Racing thrives there due to infusion of money from wealthy owners and businesses who want to promote their products and services to racing fans while networking with other individuals and businesses who have the same interests. I'll continue to look for ways for everybody in the business to be more successful, and I'll let you know how it goes.
1. race purses are not high enough to sufficiently offset the costs of racing, shipping, routine veterinary work, feed and payroll. You might be OK if you always finish 1st or 2nd with every horse or if every horse has an owner willing and able to pay $75/day toward the maintainence of each horse. In order to get started we had to own a few horses or take half ownership of client horses, and we had too many 2nds with those horses. So in a race with a $10,000 purse, we had too many finish 2nd for a 20% share or $2000 instead of a winner's 60% share or $6000. A 2nd place finisher earning $2000 only covered his own expenses for 1 month. If that horse needed 2 months between races, we are in the hole if we own him. We had 7 wins, 10 seconds, 4 thirds during the year - if 2 or 3 of those 2nd placers had won we might have broken even most of the year.
2. we were unable to recruit an owner willing to send us a horse and pay $75/day toward his care. It was our experience that for owners to be willing to take a chance on our start-up (even if they were our former clients in years past), they required a significant discount on day rate, generally $55-$65 was the day rate they would pay. It was our experience racing in Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois and Florida that this rate will not allow a trainer to break even on shipping, feed, payroll and the cost of rental housing while traveling - especially if too many horses finish 2nd instead of 1st.
I think this is part of the reason for the trend toward the mega-stables, the old "economy of scale" rule. These stables have enough cash flow to keep the whole machine running even if some owners get behind on monthly invoices. A small start-up can't carry owners who get behind because they must have enough cash on hand to make payroll and to buy feed. Unfortunately in a mega-stable, the individual horse is often lost in a crowd.
3. we were unable to organize partnerships of 2-5 investors to claim horses. This may have been due to the state of the economy in 2009 and 2010, because we had 8-10 investors interested who backed out when it came time to deposit several thousand $ with the track bookkeeper. Most people said the timing was bad. If we could show them something about the investment to help them see it as a way to help their business with networking opportunities, then things might have been different.
A private club for owners at the track would work wonders - most tracks offer trainers some options to give owners access to a jockey club suite or dining room reservations when they have a horse "in", but these are very ineffective for attracting new owners. The track needs to have a big room with easy access to paddock and winners circle for elderly owners or those who can't deal with crowds, food and drink in a chic atmosphere, and only open to licensed owners with 5% or more share of a horse and licensed trainers - and no additional membership fee - essentially an upscale "horsemen's lounge". One reason tracks don't do this is because they don't know who the owners are - the corporate office, the racing office and the bookkeeper don't share owner and trainer data. An owner has to go through a time consuming and expensive process just to get licensed, giving all their personal data to the state's racing commission, including percent ownership and home address, yet when you call the bookkeeper to get a check from your account they have no idea what your address is? The "front side" (corporate) and the "back side" (horsemen) of the tracks don't usually work well together if at all and that's a shame.
4. synthetic tracks were a big, major problem for us. If you have a horse that has never run on a synthetic track before, but the only available race when he is ready to run is on synthetic then it's a huge gamble to try him on it. A small stable can't afford to gamble like this but we felt we had to do it, and in every case we lost the gamble either due to a very consistent dirt or grass horse not handling the polytrack at all, or due to injuries on polytrack. If you don't have an owner to pay the upkeep, the only way for the horse to support himself is to race. If the horse doesn't like synthetic, you have to ship to the dirt or turf race and that costs money that the owner is gambling to recoup in the race. Shipping is very expensive. So you end up gambling on the shipping expense or gambling on the surface, neither is sound business.
So we plan to return to Saudi Arabia to train for a single owner with 20-30 horses. Racing thrives there due to infusion of money from wealthy owners and businesses who want to promote their products and services to racing fans while networking with other individuals and businesses who have the same interests. I'll continue to look for ways for everybody in the business to be more successful, and I'll let you know how it goes.
Thursday, January 21, 2010
Is it impossible to start a new public race training stable in 2010?
Jere and I have been back in the United States since April 2009. After being out of the country for so many years we knew it would be tough to get a racing stable started again, but we felt we did a good job of keeping in touch with former and potential new clients while we were gone, and we had a little money in savings to invest in the start-up. Now it's January 2010 and although we're still in business, we're just barely able to pay business expenses and we haven't added many new horses to our roster. Although the most prominent stables charge a minimum of $75/day per horse, we are finding that about $65/day is what the majority of owners are willing to pay. For more about the costs associated with racing, see http://racehorsetrainers.com/dayrates.htm - this is several years out of date, so keep in mind that costs have risen since then.
We are stabled at Gulfstream Park for the winter and it's been challenging due to the very high expense for hay and bedding that must be shipped to south florida from northern states, plus the unexpected flooding of the barn area in December. Despite this it's been an overall good experience so far. The racetrack has drawn a huge crowd every race day, and the dirt and turf courses are in excellent shape.
We have a photo gallery in Jere's web site that's labeled "kentucky gallery" but I'm adding the photos from Florida there as well. I also started a YouTube channel and I'll be adding videos about our racing experiences here at Gulfstream soon. You can click on the link to our YouTube channel from Jere's web site at http://www.jrsmithjr.com/ - please visit the site and send us an email or give Jere a call anytime.
If you are an owner, trainer or other industry professional we invite your comments about the current economics of the racing business.
We are stabled at Gulfstream Park for the winter and it's been challenging due to the very high expense for hay and bedding that must be shipped to south florida from northern states, plus the unexpected flooding of the barn area in December. Despite this it's been an overall good experience so far. The racetrack has drawn a huge crowd every race day, and the dirt and turf courses are in excellent shape.
We have a photo gallery in Jere's web site that's labeled "kentucky gallery" but I'm adding the photos from Florida there as well. I also started a YouTube channel and I'll be adding videos about our racing experiences here at Gulfstream soon. You can click on the link to our YouTube channel from Jere's web site at http://www.jrsmithjr.com/ - please visit the site and send us an email or give Jere a call anytime.
If you are an owner, trainer or other industry professional we invite your comments about the current economics of the racing business.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
